As a dad, I’m used to interruptions — from kids bursting in during a quiet moment or to those “battery is low” smoke alarm warnings. Nothing grates quite like those slick pharmaceutical ads blaring across the TV, promising quick fixes while soft-pedaling potential side effects.

That’s why I’m excited by recent proposals from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Department of Health and Human Services to fight misleading ads by forcing more side-effects transparency and ending tax breaks for pharmaceutical advertising.

A recent Washington Post editorial suggests that advertisements nudge patients to spot undiagnosed issues and consult their doctor. Does the pharmaceutical industry think the American people are so clueless that we need a commercial to know when we’re feeling off?

Ads don’t encourage thoughtful conversations with primary care physicians — they push viewers toward medication-only solutions, skewing conversations away from lifestyle choices.

It’s more troubling when kids catch these ads, absorbing the idea that every problem has a pill. The United States and New Zealand are the only countries that allow this direct-to-consumer advertising, and that should raise red flags. Why has the entire world caught onto the dangers of this advertising, but the land of the free refuses to nip it in the bud? These ads are not about empowerment; they’re meant to condition us, especially young minds, to see medication as the default.

Worse, these ads aren’t about transparency; they’re about sales. Companies push brand-name blockbuster drugs to increase profits and then write off their advertising costs, sometimes to the tune of $1.5 billion. And let’s not pretend the ads are informative. If they were, why would Big Pharma quickly rattle off the most dangerous side effects at the end of the ad (and in fine print)? Side effects often cause more misery than the ailments they treat.

Real health doesn’t come from a pill bottle but rather from how we live. The Post’s claim that ads keep us healthier ignores the power of natural choices. While science, including the National Institute of Health, agrees that lifestyle choices are the deciding factor for one’s health, it doesn’t take a peer-reviewed journal to realize the benefits of healthy living.

I’m not saying prescriptions are never needed. Diabetics need insulin, and someone in crisis might benefit from temporary anxiety medication. That’s not the reality we live in. Instead, prescription drug use is as much an epidemic as chronic illness. Twenty percent of children are on one or more prescription drugs. The typical American is on at least four prescription drugs.

As a parent, these statistics terrify me. They should worry you, too. The goal should be long-term wellness through lifestyle, not lifelong dependency on drugs.

Proposals to limit these ads are a step toward protecting us, especially the kids, from Big Pharma’s grip. Let’s focus on the most effective prescription for a healthier America: moving our bodies, eating well and connecting as families.

Alex Ward is a high school economics teacher and a father/InsideSources