Herald readers nail Karen Read outcome, sort of
You’ve done it again!
Herald readers came tantalizingly close to predicting the outcome of the Karen Read retrial in our poll.
Out of the 4,645 votes cast, 76% predicted a not guilty finding. That was close, the jury found Read guilty of only OUI, as you know. In our poll, 9% of you said she would be found guilty of “one or more” of the charges. The drunken driving conviction is a misdemeanor, so whoever leaned that way is the winner.
It still feels like a win for the not guilty crowd, though. The rest of you — the 11% who voted for “guilty” and the 4% who asked to be woken up when it’s over — fill out the voting field. Time to wake up, by the way. Thanks for voting!
More Stories
‘I’m praying they get policy right’: Dimon puts Burnham on notice
Jamie Dimon has handed Andy Burnham’s day-old government both a vote of confidence and a warning shot. The JP Morgan...
Farmers to Burnham: you said the family farm tax ‘needs looking at again’
Andy Burnham has been in Downing Street for barely a day, and rural Britain has already presented him with his...
Definitely maybe: what PM Andy Burnham means for British business
I went to the Hacienda exactly once, in the early nineties, a Londoner up for the weekend who queued for...
Why Your Team Is Your Most Underused Marketing Channel on LinkedIn
A mid-sized company can spend months perfecting a LinkedIn page that a few hundred people follow, while the audience it...
Visa turns to Rightcharge as 73% of fleet charging moves home
British EV charging specialist Rightcharge has been certified as Visa’s only recommended home charging reimbursement partner in Europe, a tie-up...
Searches for ‘VAT definition’ leap 23% as filing deadline looms
Britain’s business owners are quietly Googling their way through VAT season. Searches for “VAT definition” have jumped 23 per cent...
