Movie review: Dialogue-free ‘Silent Night’ pummels away without respite
The dialogue-free action movie “Silent Night” is a fascinating experiment — but a failed one. As it turns out, modern action movies, though they can be ideal vessels for bombastic image-making, need words to convey humor and humanity, and not even one of our foremost action auteurs, John Woo, can make it work without those two elements.
“Silent Night” is Woo’s much heralded return to Hollywood after two decades (his last American film was 2003’s “Paycheck”). The Hong Kong filmmaker behind movies like “Face/Off” and “Mission: Impossible II,” as well as his iconic collaborations with Chow Yun-Fat, “Hard Boiled” and “The Killer,” is the poet laureate of action movies, known for his expressive, evocative and highly influential style.
One would think a stylist like Woo could make a dialogue-free project work, but not with the dog of a script he’s been handed by screenwriter Robert Archer Lynn. The story of “Silent Night” is a rabid right-wing “Death Wish”-style revenge fantasy trafficking in some of the most virulently dangerous conspiracy theories about life in an urban metropolis, where children are gunned down in their front yards by Mexican gangs on Christmas Eve. The violent ethnic stereotypes only get worse from there.
The opening “in media res” is promising, a slo-mo foot race that focuses on the jingle bell necklace and bloodied Christmas sweater worn by our anti-hero Brian Godlock (Joel Kinnaman). It’s an overly bright, color-saturated SoCal Christmas, and there’s a certain irreverence that hints at something like “Crank,” the mid-aughts high-concept Jason Statham vehicle by Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor. I never thought I’d long for the charms of these roller-blading action filmmakers, but at least they had a sense of humor about themselves and their work, a tone that disappears almost immediately in “Silent Night.”
Brian tracks down a pair of vehicles locked in a chaotic shootout racing through town (we don’t know it yet, but it’s the shootout that has killed his son in a drive-by). He faces off with the last-standing gunman, a heavily tatted gangster (Harold Torres), who shoots him in the throat, destroying his vocal chords. Therein lies the whole “silent” conceit, which carries through to every other character in the film, including Brian’s wife Saya (Catalina Sandino Moreno) and “Las Palomas” gang force detective Vassell (Kid Cudi).
Speaking of Saya, it’s 10 a.m., do you know where your husband is? She seems to not notice that Brian, grieving the loss of their son, is in the garage getting radicalized on YouTube, assembling an arsenal and training himself to become a vigilante.
It’s a byproduct of living in the United States these days that it’s just no fun at all to watch a white man with a vendetta against people of color suit up in a trench coat with his illegally purchased weapons and an array of explosives. It’s a stomach-turning image and it should be. When Brian finishes his training and heads out to try his hand at being Batman against the “G17” gang, it’s exhausting rather than exhilarating.
Woo still has his visual flair, and there are some striking images and even surrealist sequences as Brian storms the glass factory where the gang is holed up. He utilizes fog and headlights in this gritty setting, and long shots that call to mind sequences from “The Raid” and “Atomic Blonde.” But the film is tiresome, soundtracked only to grunts, gunshots, and grinding techno music, without any punchlines to punctuate the tension. You realize that these quips and asides add breaths and beats to the rhythm, providing a release valve that never comes in “Silent Night,” which pummels away without respite.
But more importantly, words add humanity to these characters. Everyone onscreen is reduced to stereotype and problematic tropes without being allowed anything to say: Brian is the disaffected white male vigilante, the gang members are brutish thugs judged by their appearance. The sentimental memories and snarling villainy presented here do not adequately offer characterization. Back in the silent era, Buster Keaton and his peers pulled off action filmmaking with humor and heart, but the failure of “Silent Night” proves that it’s a much taller order when it comes to modern moviemaking.
‘Silent Night’
1.5 stars (out of 4)
MPA rating: R (for strong bloody violence, drug use and some language)
Running time: 1:44
How to watch: In theaters Friday
Related Articles
‘Candy Cane Lane’ review: My Christmas wish is for Eddie Murphy to find a better Christmas movie
Watch six memorable ads from Walker Art Center’s annual British Arrows Awards
20 years on, a transformed New Zealand looks back at ‘Lord of the Rings’
When Don and Barbara Rickles met Bob and Ginnie Newhart, they became friends for life — as told in Judd Apatow’s latest film
‘Renaissance: A Film by Beyoncé’ review: A bonafide superstar captures a very big tour, for concert movie posterity