Understanding those differences is central to assessing real estate in Europe and the Middle East, where the sources of opportunity can be quite different even when the investment questions are similar.

Real estate was the starting point of Avi Itzcovich’s investment career in 2016. His subsequent work encompasses entrepreneurship and technology investment. That background brings together businesses whose products can reach new customers and physical assets whose earning capacity depends on a particular location. Examining the economics of a building means understanding both its immediate operating needs and its prospects over years of ownership.

Europe and the Value of Existing Buildings

In established European urban markets, the investment case often begins with buildings that already exist. A well-connected address can offer enduring advantages, but location alone does not resolve the practical demands of an ageing property. Heating systems, insulation, lifts and shared spaces influence the cost of occupation and the amount an owner must spend to keep the building competitive.

Renovation therefore needs to be considered as part of the purchase decision. An apparently attractive acquisition price can conceal substantial expenditure before a property is ready for use. Equally, a building that requires work may offer an opportunity when the scope of improvement is clear and its cost is reflected in the price. The distinction depends on knowing what must be repaired, what can be improved and which changes occupants will actually value.

The European Commission identifies improving existing buildings as a core part of its energy-efficiency policy. A more efficient building can reduce running costs, but the commercial case for an upgrade depends on who pays those costs and how the lease allocates responsibility. An owner may fund substantial improvements while the immediate savings accrue to a tenant. Recovering that expenditure through rent, occupancy or resale value requires a separate assessment rather than an assumption that every improvement pays for itself.

Converting a property to another use raises similar questions. An underused building does not automatically become a successful residential asset because housing is needed nearby. Its layout, access, daylight and servicing arrangements must support the proposed use, while permissions and construction requirements affect both cost and timing. The potential lies in making a building useful again, with a budget that accounts for the work needed to achieve it.

The Middle East and the Timing of Demand

Across Middle Eastern property markets, development and infrastructure can change the appeal of a location. New employment centres, transport connections and services may expand the number of people willing to live or work nearby. For an investor, the relevant question is how that wider development translates into demand for a particular building, at the rent required to support its price.

Demand also has a composition. A property designed for short visits faces different occupancy patterns and management needs from one intended for long-term residents. Business premises depend on the activities and requirements of their users. Broad enthusiasm for a market offers limited guidance when the proposed asset serves a much narrower group of tenants.

Supply must be examined with equal care. A building that appears distinctive when purchased may compete with several similar projects by the time it becomes available. Their completion schedules matter alongside their number. Additional supply can give tenants more choice and place pressure on achievable rents, particularly where buildings offer comparable layouts, services and access.

Projects bought before completion add another timing consideration. The investment includes the interval between committing capital and receiving usable space or rental income. Delays can affect financing costs and postpone revenue, while the surrounding area may develop at a different pace from the building itself. Established properties allow more direct observation of occupancy and operating expenses; development-stage assets require a different assessment of execution and delivery.

Financing Connects the Two Investment Cases

Financing determines how much room an investor has to respond when operating conditions change. A European refurbishment and a newly delivered Middle Eastern property may face very different operating conditions. Both can become financially strained if borrowing costs or repayment dates are poorly aligned with the income the asset generates.

The terms of a loan can change the economics even when the property forecast stays the same. A fixed interest rate provides greater visibility over interest payments for the agreed period. A floating rate leaves those payments exposed to changes in its benchmark. Repayment schedules determine how quickly debt must be reduced, and a loan falling due during major works may force a refinancing decision before the improvement in rental income has arrived.

A building’s energy performance can also affect access to financing. Drawing on its bank lending survey, the European Central Bank reports that high energy performance has helped ease credit standards for housing loans, while poor performance has had the opposite effect. The quality of a property can therefore influence the financing available to its owner as well as its running costs.

The sensitivity of those assumptions matters as much as the central forecast. A building may perform acceptably at the expected rent but leave little room for a longer vacancy or an unplanned repair. A financing arrangement that works during the initial period may require refinancing before the asset reaches a stable operating position. Those conditions help determine whether an acquisition can withstand a less favourable outcome.

The property and technology sectors represented in Itzcovich’s investment background have different routes to growth. A technology business may expand the reach of a product, while a building’s earning capacity is constrained by its available space and the cost of keeping that space useful. Financing needs to accommodate those characteristics over the intended holding period, including periods when expenditure precedes any improvement in income.

Management and the Eventual Buyer

After acquisition, much of an investment’s outcome rests on execution. Timely repairs, accurate billing and effective tenant communication affect income and retention. A refurbishment budget has limited value if the work takes substantially longer than planned. A good location cannot compensate indefinitely for a poorly maintained building or services that fail to meet occupants’ needs.

Leasing strategy connects the condition of a building to the income it can support. A long lease may provide visibility of rent, but its value also depends on the tenant’s capacity to pay and the obligations accepted by the owner. Flexible layouts can widen the range of potential occupants; a highly specialised fit-out may limit future use. These characteristics influence what happens when a tenant leaves and how much work is needed before the space can be let again.

An eventual buyer will examine many of the same issues. Rental income needs to be supported by leases and payment history, while deferred work can alter the price a buyer is prepared to pay. Exit value is therefore connected to decisions made throughout ownership, including expenditure that may look unattractive in a single reporting period but preserves the building’s longer-term usefulness.

Comparing Europe and the Middle East is most useful when the analysis stays close to individual buildings and the people who use them. The opportunity may begin with an existing building that can be improved or with demand for newly delivered space. Its investment quality ultimately depends on what it costs to acquire, operate and finance the property, and how convincingly its future income can be supported.

Read the full article →