A federal judge ruled Friday that President Donald Trump’s administration cannot block federal money for child care subsidies and other programs aimed at supporting needy children and their families from flowing to five Democratic-led states for now.

Related Articles

Fractures are starting to show in Trump’s GOP at the start of this election year

Judge to temporarily block effort to end protections for relatives of citizens, green card holders

New Dakota County Board chair says 2026 will be a ‘buckle-up’ year

Poor communities threatened by aging sewers see crucial aid slashed under Trump

Trump pick for Gaza board Nickolay Mladenov frequently worked to ease Mideast tensions

The states of California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York argued that a policy announced Tuesday to freeze funds for three grant programs is having an immediate impact on them and creating “operational chaos.” In court filings and a hearing earlier Friday, the states contended that the government did not have a legal reason for holding back the money from those states.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it was pausing the funding because it had “reason to believe” the states were granting benefits to people in the country illegally, though it did not provide evidence or explain why it was targeting those states and not others.

The programs are the Child Care and Development Fund, which subsidizes child care for children from low-income families; the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, which provides cash assistance and job training; and the Social Services Block Grant, a smaller fund that provides money for a variety of programs.

The five states say they receive a total of more than $10 billion a year from the programs.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, who was nominated to the bench by former President Joe Biden, is in place until further arguments are made in court.

The government had requested reams of data from the five states, including the names and Social Security numbers of everyone who received benefits from some of the programs since 2022.

The states argue that the effort is unconstitutional and is intended to go after Trump’s political adversaries rather than to stamp out fraud in government programs — something the states say they already do.

Jessica Ranucci, a lawyer in the New York Attorney General’s office, said in the Friday hearing, which was conducted by telephone, that at least four of the states had already had money delayed after requesting it. She said that if the states can’t get child care funds, there will be immediate uncertainty for providers and families who rely on the programs.

A lawyer for the federal government, Kamika Shaw, said it was her understanding that the money had not stopped flowing to states.

Related Articles

Minnesota woman dies from suspected shark attack in Virgin Islands

Duluth police officer leaves force after allegations of sexual assault

3 takeaways from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s Minnesota visit

Hennepin County prosecutor calls on the public to share Renee Good shooting evidence with her office

Minnesota freezes provider enrollment for 13 Medicaid programs over fraud risk