Editorial: National Guard ambush latest sign of incendiary politics

The ambush attack on two National Guard troops in D.C. Wednesday is horrifying. But it is not surprising.

President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in a bid to quell protests over ICE arrests and/or fight crime in major cities has been a flashpoint since the first boots hit the ground. And political pushback against Trump’s move featured the favorite buzzwords of the left: fascist, dictator, authoritarian.

The National Guard were not just men and women serving our country, they were part of the hated Trump “regime.”

When the Guard was deployed in LA this summer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren told a September hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, “We cannot let the military become a political weapon to intimidate our communities.”

She was hardly alone in depicting the Guard’s deployment as part and parcel of part of the president’s “fascist” machinations.

What she and so many of the anti-Trumpers miss time and again is that those same soundbites that invigorate the progressive base are also picked up by a growing number of people for whom dissent means violence.

Luigi Mangione has become a folk anti-hero for the alleged killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last year. Warren condemned the shooting, but in an interview with the Huffington Post, said, “Violence is never the answer. But people can only be pushed so far.”

When then-presidential candidate Trump was shot during a campaign even last year, a staffer for a Democratic Rep. posted:  “I don’t condone violence but please get you some shooting lessons so you don’t miss next time ooops that wasn’t me talking.”

Charlie Kirk’s public assassination in September was met with nauseating social media displays expressing happiness over his killing.

The trolls who once lived in the cellars of social discourse are now in the light, spreading conspiracy theories and espousing violence as a legitimate response to whatever person or institution they have a problem with.

More will be uncovered about the Afghan national who allegedly shot the two National Guard troops in DC. But we know that he is part of a disturbing trend, fueled by incendiary rhetoric, that violence “sends a message” and is a legitimate outlet for anger.

Those who credit Trump’s rhetoric on Jan. 6, 2021 with inciting the crowd into the mob that breached the Capitol can’t dismiss the us-versus-them speech emanating from liberals.

You can certainly be against Trump deploying the National Guard around the country — that’s what lawsuits are for.  A federal judge ordered an end to the National Guard deployment in Washington, D.C., last week, declaring that the use of troops was “unlawful.” The troops remain while Trump can appeal.

We have a great system of checks and balances in our democracy, it’s one of the things that sets us apart from fascist dictatorships.

Politicians who use opposition to the Trump Administration as opportunity to score re-election points via verbal bomb-throwing should pay attention to the devolving social media landscape.

Dissent is American. Vigilantism is not.

Editorial cartoon by Gary Varvel (Creators Syndicate)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous post Today in History: November 28, Boston nightclub fire kills 492 people
Next post Howie Carr: Healey’s ambition a bill taxpayers had to pick up