Supreme Court to weigh reinstating Obamacare care requirements struck down by lower court
By LINDSAY WHITEHURST
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider reinstating some preventative care coverage requirements under the Affordable Care Act that were struck down by a lower court.
Related Articles
Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a federal law that could force TikTok to shut down on Jan. 19
TikTok’s fate arrives at Supreme Court in collision of free speech and national security
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito says he spoke with Trump about clerk before hush-money filing
Federal courts won’t refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to attorney general over ethics
Supreme Court will hear arguments over the law that could ban TikTok in the US if it’s not sold
The federal government appealed to the high court after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with employers who argued they can’t be forced to provide full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. The lower-court ruling chipped away at the program sometimes referred to as Obamacare.
Challengers raised religious and procedural objections to some of the requirements.
Not all preventive care was threatened by the ruling. A 2023 analysis prepared by the KFF, a nonprofit, found that some screenings, including mammography and cervical cancer screening, would still be covered without out-of-pocket costs.
Services and medications that might not be covered under the ruling include statins to prevent heart disease, lung cancer screening, HIV prevention, as well as medications to lower the risk of breast cancer for high-risk women, the group found.
The requirements now remain in place for now, except for the eight companies who sued.
The conservative 5th Circuit found that coverage requirements were adopted unconstitutionally because they came from a body — the United States Preventive Services Task Force — whose members were not nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
The court is expected to hear the case in the spring.